The firms mentioned above offering fake peer reviews all come from countries and China in Southeast Asia, and most of the authors involved in these full cases result from the same areas. But it would be a mistake to look at this as a Chinese or Asian problem. The nagging problem may be the perverse incentive systems in scientific publishing. As long as authors are rewarded for publishing many content articles and editors are rewarded for publishing them quickly, new ways of gaming the original publication models will be invented quicker than new control actions could be put in place.. Charlotte J. Haug, M.D., Ph.D.1 The retractions came only weeks after BioMed Central, an open-access publisher also owned by Springer, retracted 43 content articles for the same reason. How is it possible to fake peer review? Moon, who studies medicinal plants, had set up a straightforward process.Quadriceps strength, knee range of motion, and gait were measured in such checks as timed up and move, stair climbing and a six-minute walk. The group in the progressive strength-training program demonstrated significant improvement in quadriceps strength and functional performance. In addition they demonstrated substantially better quadriceps strength and practical performance after 12 weeks compared to the group that underwent standard rehabilitation. This study obviously demonstrates the importance of surgeons encouraging their sufferers to become compliant with progressive quadriceps strengthening during their rehabilitation to improve their scientific improvement and function post-total knee alternative, notes Dr.